netdev - Re: Killing sk->sk_callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080618.145652.193031154.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	pmullaney@...ell.com
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, GHaskins@...ell.com,
	chuck.lever@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Killing sk->sk_callback_lock

From: "Patrick Mullaney" <pmullaney@...ell.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:49:28 -0600

> I will give it a shot - I still have reservations about changing the
> socket structures - at first glance, it seems like sock and socket will
> have to change.

If you work against net-next-2.6 everything setting sk->sk_sleep is
compartmentalized into a small number of code locations.  So such work
ought to be trivial.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html