netdev - Re: [PATCH 6/8] pxa: make lubbock to use smc91x platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806191243400.2982@xanadu.home>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:53:49 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
To:	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8]  pxa: make lubbock to use smc91x platform data

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Eric Miao wrote:

> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>

This (and 7/8 and 8/8) are a bit unfortunate.  Maybe not as visible on 
Lubbock which has a SMC91C94 which can do 10mbps only, but the others 
will have poorer performances because of those patches.  Did you compare 
performances, let's say with netperf, before and after those patches are 
applied?

I understand your goal of wanting to have a single kernel image that 
dynamically can select the right bus access method for all the concerned 
platforms.  But I think you'll see that the runtime overhead has a 
significant impact on network throughput and CPU usage.

I think that some other solution should be explored such that when only 
one machine type (or machine types with the same bus config) is 
configured then the compile time optimizations should remain.  Something 
based on the machine_is_lubbock(), machine_is_Mainstone(), and so on, 
which becomes constants with the right kernel configuration.

Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html