[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <485B067B.1080207@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:23:07 +0800
From: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
CC: linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] pxa: make lubbock to use smc91x platform data
Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Eric Miao wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>
>
> This (and 7/8 and 8/8) are a bit unfortunate. Maybe not as visible on
> Lubbock which has a SMC91C94 which can do 10mbps only, but the others
> will have poorer performances because of those patches. Did you compare
> performances, let's say with netperf, before and after those patches are
> applied?
>
> I understand your goal of wanting to have a single kernel image that
> dynamically can select the right bus access method for all the concerned
> platforms. But I think you'll see that the runtime overhead has a
> significant impact on network throughput and CPU usage.
>
> I think that some other solution should be explored such that when only
> one machine type (or machine types with the same bus config) is
> configured then the compile time optimizations should remain. Something
> based on the machine_is_lubbock(), machine_is_Mainstone(), and so on,
> which becomes constants with the right kernel configuration.
>
OK, I know your concern. Let's see if we can work this out in another way.
>
> Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists