netdev - Re: [patch v2 01/11] DM9000: Remove the 2 resources probe scheme.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080622211811.GC26276@fluff.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:18:11 +0100
From:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jeff@...zik.org, Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@...-semaphore.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 01/11] DM9000: Remove the 2 resources probe scheme.

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 09:34:18PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Ben Dooks wrote:
> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@...-semaphore.com>
> > 
> > The dm9000 driver accepts either 2 or 3 resources to describe the platform
> > devices. The 2 resources case abuses the ioresource mechanism by passing
> > ioremap()ed memory through the platform device resources. This patch removes
> > that case and converts boards that were using it to the 3 resources scheme.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@...-semaphore.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dm9000.c b/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> > index 6bc8924..fca7831 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> > @@ -528,7 +528,6 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	struct board_info *db;	/* Point a board information structure */
> >  	struct net_device *ndev;
> >  	const unsigned char *mac_src;
> > -	unsigned long base;
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  	int iosize;
> >  	int i;
> > @@ -561,78 +560,61 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (pdev->num_resources < 2) {
> >  		ret = -ENODEV;
> >  		goto out;
> [...]
> 
> So shouldn't "< 2" be changed to "!= 3"?

Hmm, I'll edit laurent's patch and re-send, assuming it's alright with
him.
 
> Ben.

No, I'm Ben!

> -- 
> Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html