netdev - Re: [PATCH] hfsc: add link layer overhead adaption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:27:26 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfsc: add link layer overhead adaption

Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
> Quoting Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>:
>>
>> This looks like an abuse of rate tables, which usually convert
>> packet sizes to transmission times. You undo that above using
>> expensive calculations.
>>
>> I think this should be done by performing the length calculation
>> in the kernel directly.
> 
> Yes, it's abuse, and actually table is created using false rate (rate = 
> PSCHED_TICKS_PER_SEC) so div_u64 is avoided. Div_u64 is there just in 
> case something goes wrong in userspace. Using rate table allows 
> changes/updates to link layer emulation with only userspace updates 
> avoiding, but maybe abuse of rate table isn't right way to do this after 
> all.
> 
> So would it be better if I add 'length table' to kernel&userspace and 
> use it instead?

Yes, I even posted an unfinished patch for this one or two years
ago, in response to the overhead calculation patches for HTB etc.

I can't find it right now, but haven't tried too hard. It was
called qdisc STABs (for size tables), you should be able to find
it in the archives.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html