netdev - [PATCH] netlabel: Fix a problem when dumping the default IPv6 static labels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:29:13 -0400
From:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] netlabel: Fix a problem when dumping the default IPv6 static
	labels

There is a missing "!" in a conditional statement which is causing entries to
be skipped when dumping the default IPv6 static label entries.  This can be
demonstrated by running the following:

 # netlabelctl unlbl add default address:::1 \
                                 label:system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0
 # netlabelctl -p unlbl list

... you will notice that the entry for the IPv6 localhost address is not
displayed but does exist (works correctly, causes collisions when attempting
to add duplicate entries, etc.).

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
---

 net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
index 0099da5..52b2611 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
@@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlistdef(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		}
 	}
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(addr6, &iface->addr6_list, list) {
-		if (addr6->valid || iter_addr6++ < skip_addr6)
+		if (!addr6->valid || iter_addr6++ < skip_addr6)
 			continue;
 		if (netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(NLBL_UNLABEL_C_STATICLISTDEF,
 					   iface,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html