[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1214428440.6908.1.camel@brick>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:14:00 -0700
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] net: em_cmp.c use unaligned access helpers
Both locations are loading a big-endian value in cpu-endianness. The
be32/be16_to_cpu immediately afterwards seems suspect.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
---
net/sched/em_cmp.c | 11 +++--------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/em_cmp.c b/net/sched/em_cmp.c
index cc49c93..56f1eae 100644
--- a/net/sched/em_cmp.c
+++ b/net/sched/em_cmp.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/tc_ematch/tc_em_cmp.h>
#include <net/pkt_cls.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
static inline int cmp_needs_transformation(struct tcf_em_cmp *cmp)
{
@@ -37,9 +38,7 @@ static int em_cmp_match(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_ematch *em,
break;
case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U16:
- val = *ptr << 8;
- val |= *(ptr+1);
-
+ val = get_unaligned_be16(ptr);
if (cmp_needs_transformation(cmp))
val = be16_to_cpu(val);
break;
@@ -47,11 +46,7 @@ static int em_cmp_match(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_ematch *em,
case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U32:
/* Worth checking boundries? The branching seems
* to get worse. Visit again. */
- val = *ptr << 24;
- val |= *(ptr+1) << 16;
- val |= *(ptr+2) << 8;
- val |= *(ptr+3);
-
+ val = get_unaligned_be32(ptr);
if (cmp_needs_transformation(cmp))
val = be32_to_cpu(val);
break;
--
1.5.6.290.gc4e15
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists