[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:17:52 +0800
From: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
NETDEV <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: v3 [PATCH net-next 4/7] ipv6: Check return of dev_set_allmulti
Patrick McHardy said the following on 2008-7-7 19:20:
> Wang Chen wrote:
>> allmulti might overflow.
>> Commit: "netdevice: Fix promiscuity and allmulti overflow" in net-next
>> makes
>> dev_set_promiscuity/allmulti return error number if overflow happened.
>>
>> Here, we check the positive increment for allmulti to get error return.
>>
>> @@ -627,13 +633,14 @@ static int mif6_add(struct mif6ctl *vifc, int
>> mrtsock)
>> if (!dev)
>> return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>> dev_put(dev);
>> + err = dev_set_allmulti(dev, 1);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>
> The use of dev after putting it looks wrong, but thats already
> present before your patch. So ACK for your patch, but we need
> a fix on top.
>
Wait a moment :)
---
case 0:
dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, vifc->mif6c_pifi);
if (!dev)
return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
dev_put(dev);
---
dev_get_by_index() holds the dev, so I think dev_put() just for hold/put
balance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists