[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080708144725.5b663d19@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:47:25 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: swise@...ngridcomputing.com, rdreier@...co.com,
shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Printing the driver name as part of the netdev watchdog message
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:13:43 -0500
>
> > So should I put the rtnl acquisitions back in iw_cxgb3? Or fix
> > cxgb3 to not assume rtnl is held?
>
> It appears that the kernel always invokes the ethtool ops with
> RTNL held, and therefore that's the environment that needs
> to be ensured.
so for the patch that started all this... do I need to go back to the
original where I didn't use ethool?
(since this is called from irq context....)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists