netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11058] New: DEADLOOP in kernel network module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4874E839.50100@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:32:57 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hemao77@...il.com,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist 
	<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11058] New: DEADLOOP in kernel network module

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>> Good catch, thanks. Basically all del_timer()/timeout.function calls
>>> in conntrack can happen in process context, so we'd have to disable
>>> BHs every time we do this. I think this fix should also work. The
>>> only spot where we return NF_REPEAT is in TCP conntrack, so we can
>>> simply make sure we only do this if we actually managed to kill the
>>> connection.
>>>
>>> Jozsef, what do you think?
>>
>> I agree with you completely - and nice catch, indeed! Your proposed 
>> patch looks just fine.
> 
> Thanks, I'll send a backport for 2.6.26 to Dave tonight.

OK, this is the patch I'll send upstream.


View attachment "x" of type "text/plain" (1805 bytes)