[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4874EABC.4000301@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:43:40 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Julius Volz <juliusv@...gle.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
vbusam@...gle.com, horms@...ge.net.au, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] IPVS: Add genetlink interface implementation
Julius Volz wrote:
> Add the implementation of the new Generic Netlink interface to IPVS and keep
> the old set/getsockopt interface for userspace backwards compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julius Volz <juliusv@...gle.com>
Just a few quick comments, will try to do a full review later:
> + * Policy used for commands that operate on service, destination
> + * or daemon entries
> + */
> +static struct nla_policy ip_vs_entries_policy[IPVS_ENTRY_ATTR_MAX + 1]
> +__read_mostly = {
These can all be const (and have the __read_mostly annotation removed).
> +static int ip_vs_genl_fill_stats(struct sk_buff *skb, int container_type,
> + struct ip_vs_stats *stats)
> +{
> + struct nlattr *nl_stats = nla_nest_start(skb, container_type);
> + if (!nl_stats)
> + goto nla_put_failure;
Unbalanced locking.
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&stats->lock);
> +
> + NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_CONNS, stats->conns);
> + NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_INPKTS, stats->inpkts);
> + NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_OUTPKTS, stats->outpkts);
> + NLA_PUT_U64(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_INBYTES, stats->inbytes);
> + NLA_PUT_U64(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_OUTBYTES, stats->outbytes);
> + NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_CPS, stats->cps);
> + NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_INPPS, stats->inpps);
> + NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_OUTPPS, stats->outpps);
> + NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_INBPS, stats->inbps);
> + NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_OUTBPS, stats->outbps);
> +
> + spin_unlock_bh(&stats->lock);
> +
> + nla_nest_end(skb, nl_stats);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +nla_put_failure:
> + spin_unlock_bh(&stats->lock);
> +
> + nla_nest_cancel(skb, nl_stats);
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +}
> +
> +static int ip_vs_genl_set_cmd(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> + struct ip_vs_service *svc;
> + struct ip_vs_service_user usvc;
> + struct ip_vs_dest_user udest;
> + int ret = 0, cmd, flags;
> + int need_full_svc = 0, need_full_dest = 0;
> +
> + cmd = info->genlhdr->cmd;
> + flags = info->nlhdr->nlmsg_flags;
> +
> + /* increase the module use count */
> + ip_vs_use_count_inc();
This looks fishy - the reference probably must be taken by
genetlink before calling the command handler.
> +int ip_vs_genl_register(void)
> +{
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + ret = genl_register_family(&ip_vs_genl_family);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ip_vs_genl_ops); i++) {
> + ret = genl_register_ops(&ip_vs_genl_family, &ip_vs_genl_ops[i]);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_out:
> + genl_unregister_family(&ip_vs_genl_family);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void ip_vs_genl_unregister(void)
> +{
> + genl_unregister_family(&ip_vs_genl_family);
Doesn't it also has to unregister the ops?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists