[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080709184329.GC5383@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:43:30 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, aglo@...i.umich.edu,
shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rees@...ch.edu
Subject: Re: setsockopt()
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 02:11:22PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields (bfields@...ldses.org) wrote:
> > Yeah, its a bit confusing. It probably was copypasted, there is no
> > default, but minimum possible value.
>
> I don't understand; what do you mean by "there is no default"? (And if
> not, what does tcp_wmem[1] mean?)
I meant there is no default value for tcp_w/rmem[2], which is calculated
based on tcp_mem, which in turn is calculated based on amount RAM of in
the system. tcp_wmem[2] will be at least 64k, but its higher limit
(calculated by system, which of course can be overwritten) is RAM/256 on
x86 (iirc only low mem is counted, although that was different in
various kernel versions), but not more than 4Mb.
tcp_wmem[1] means initial send buffer size, it can grow up to tcp_wmem[2].
There is a default for this parameter. Actually all this numbers are a
bit fluffy, so they are kind of soft rules for socket memory accounting
mechanics.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists