[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1215723617.6901.3.camel@dell>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:00:17 -0700
From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: "joy@...ian.org" <joy@...ian.org>,
"billfink@...dspring.com" <billfink@...dspring.com>,
"bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"mirrors@...ian.org" <mirrors@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: bnx2_poll panicking kernel
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 16:46 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Actually I went investigating this and all the code paths check for
> skb_cloned() and if true they make a copy of the data area (and thus
> the skb_shared_info()) and this should ensure that the driver doesn't
> see changing nr_frags values.
Since Josip can readily reproduce this problem, let's confirm if the SKB
is split while it is cloned. Please try this debug patch:
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 5c459f2..03ec3b8 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -1960,6 +1960,10 @@ void skb_split(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_buff *skb1, const u32 len)
{
int pos = skb_headlen(skb);
+ if (skb_cloned(skb)) {
+ printk(KERN_ALERT "Splitting cloned skb\n")
+ dump_stack();
+ }
if (len < pos) /* Split line is inside header. */
skb_split_inside_header(skb, skb1, len, pos);
else /* Second chunk has no header, nothing to copy. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists