netdev - Re: v4 [PATCH 9/9] 8021q: Check return of dev_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080714.210056.47426171.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	wangchen@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: v4 [PATCH 9/9] 8021q: Check return of
 dev_set_promiscuity/allmulti

From: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:59:49 +0800

> dev_set_promiscuity/allmulti might overflow.
> Commit: "netdevice: Fix promiscuity and allmulti overflow" in net-next makes
> dev_set_promiscuity/allmulti return error number if overflow happened.
> 
> Here, we check all positive increment for promiscuity and allmulti
> to get error return.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> Acked-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>

Applied.

But I had to apply this one also by hand, as it conflicted with
Patrick's GVRP changes already in the tree.

When you are maintaining a patch set like this, you have to update
your tree and regenerate your patches in order to make sure no new
conflicts exist before submitting your patches.

That part isn't my job :)

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html