[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080715.023954.234208581.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: johannes@...solutions.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:37:01 +0200
> From mac80211's POV it's just that select_queue must have known
> about the removed queue when the requeue is done. And we can defer
> the requeue to a workqueue.
Ok.
So you're proposing the requeue be deferred to a workqueue
and what else? RCU protection around real_num_tx_queues
access?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists