[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080715.024519.95002238.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/13]: netdev: Allocate multiple queues for TX.
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:19:39 +0200
> On i386 for example, sizeof(struct netdev_queue) = 0x2c
>
> Shouldnt we make sure each queue sits on its own cache line on CONFIG_SMP ?
Yes.
> Also, dev->_tx and dev->num_tx_queues might share a cache line with
> dev->rx_queue, was it intended ?
Nope.
I've added the ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp annotations to my
tree, thanks!
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ struct netdev_queue {
struct Qdisc *qdisc_sleeping;
struct list_head qdisc_list;
struct netdev_queue *next_sched;
-};
+} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
...
@@ -641,7 +641,9 @@ struct net_device
unsigned char broadcast[MAX_ADDR_LEN]; /* hw bcast add */
struct netdev_queue rx_queue;
- struct netdev_queue tx_queue ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+
+ struct netdev_queue *_tx ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+ unsigned int num_tx_queues;
unsigned long tx_queue_len; /* Max frames per queue allowed */
...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists