[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A0D5B4.9050908@kernel.sg>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:13:40 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.sg>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: brian.haley@...com, adobriyan@...il.com, john.gumb@...dberg.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
parag.warudkar@...il.com
Subject: Re: OOPS, ip -f inet6 route get fec0::1, linux-2.6.26, ip6_route_output,
rt6_fill_node+0x175
David Miller wrote:
> From: Eugene Teo <eteo@...hat.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:40:24 +0800
>
>> Brian Haley wrote:
>>> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:00:56PM +0200, John Gumb wrote:
>>>>> Scenario: no ipv6 default route set.
>>>>> # ip -f inet6 route get fec0::1
>>>>>
>>>>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000
>>>>> IP: [<c0369b85>] rt6_fill_node+0x175/0x3b0
>>>>> EIP is at rt6_fill_node+0x175/0x3b0
>>>> 0xffffffff80424dd3 is in rt6_fill_node (net/ipv6/route.c:2191).
>>>> 2186 } else
>>>> 2187 #endif
>>>> 2188 NLA_PUT_U32(skb, RTA_IIF, iif);
>>>> 2189 } else if (dst) {
>>>> 2190 struct in6_addr saddr_buf;
>>>> 2191 ====> if
>>>> (ipv6_dev_get_saddr(ip6_dst_idev(&rt->u.dst)->dev,
>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> NULL
>>>>
>>>> 2192 dst, 0, &saddr_buf) == 0)
>>>> 2193 NLA_PUT(skb, RTA_PREFSRC, 16,
>>>> &saddr_buf);
>>>> 2194 }
>>> The commit that changed this can't be reverted easily, but the patch
>>> below works for me.
>>>
>>> Fix NULL de-reference in rt6_fill_node() when there's no IPv6 input
>>> device present in the dst entry.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
>> Cc: Stable <stable@...nel.org>
>
> We've already determined from one tester that the behavior is
> changing with Brian's patch. Furthermore I haven't applied it
> to mainline so it isn't anywhere near being submittable for
> -stable.
With the patch I posted, this is the behaviour I get:
$ ip -f inet6 route get fec0::1
unreachable fec0::1 dev lo table unspec proto none src
fe80::214:4fff:fe0f:7332 metric -1 error -101 hoplimit 255
John emailed me that he will be testing this patch. I have not tested
Brian's patch.
> I submit all relevant networking bug fixes to -stable when they are
> ready and in a proper state to be submitted, you don't have to do it
> for me. Sending me a gentle reminder or nudge, on the other hand, is
> fine.
Thanks for letting me know. I wasn't familiar, but I welcome the hint.
Thanks,
Eugene
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists