[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1219157858.18027.44.camel@sauron>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:57:38 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To: Hirofumi Nakagawa <hnakagawa@...aclelinux.com>
Cc: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, christof.schmitt@...ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove duplicated unlikely() in IS_ERR()
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 08:55 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 16:16 +0900, Hirofumi Nakagawa wrote:
> > Hi
> > Some drivers have duplicated unlikely() macros.
> > IS_ERR() already has unlikely() in itself.
> > This patch cleans up such pointless codes although there is no real
> > effect on the kernel's behaviour.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hirofumi Nakagawa
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hirofumi Nakagawa <hnakagawa@...aclelinux.com>
> > ---
>
> Hmm, after thinking a bit I am not sure this is the right way to go.
> Indeed, we try to avoid likly()/unlikely(), unless this is really
> hot-path. Some kernel developers even think these hints should never
> be used. So I'd say, the right thing would bo to remove unlikely()
> from IS_ERR() macro instead.
OK, after some googling I tend to thing having unlikely() in IS_ERR() is
OK, so I take your patch. Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists