[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f2db9d90808231209i134a7afbu233269c8ea592422@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:09:42 -0700
From: "Alexander Duyck" <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: "Jarek Poplawski" <jarkao2@...il.com>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
jeff@...zik.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pkt_sched: restore multiqueue prio scheduler
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:49 AM, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-23-08 at 09:31 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> Actually in this new multiple tx queue kernel this qdisc could serve a
>> very specific but needed purpose which just became apparent to me.
>> This qdisc resolves one very specific issue, head-of-line blocking if
>> one of the hardware queues is full. What if I reversed things a bit
>> in prio_classify so that skb->queue_mapping determined the band
>> instead of the other way around in the case of the multiqueue option
>> being enabled? I would think that in this configuration the qdisc
>> would prove to be pretty useful for purposes other than QOS since it
>> would allow a classful qdisc per transmit queue instead of per device.
>>
>
> i think thats whats Dave is saying not in so many words.
>
> prio_classify calls classifiers.
> dont modify the qdisc; rather do a classification which when matched
> sets skb->queue_mapping to a value your policy likes it to be.
> you dont need a new classifier, u32 would do for example. or ematch if
> you want to do some funky things. you will need a new action which sets
> the skb->queue_mapping.
We have to modify the existing prio qdisc or create a new qdisc in
order to resolve the head-of-line blocking once any of the queues have
stopped. The new one wouldn't make any changes to the priority of the
packet but instead would only switch it to a separate qdisc based on
the queue_mapping of the skb.
I get the fact that all we would need is a new action to handle the
queue mapping, but in order for that to be an acceptable solution I
still need the qdisc changes.
>> I could then create a select_queue for the device that returns 0 when
>> in DCB/EEDC mode for our drivers, implement the tc action to set the
>> queue mapping, and have essentially the same result as I had before.
>>
> put overflow queues in your driver. With the new multiq approach the
> controls are per-queue not per driver.
>
I think you missed the email from Dave earlier, either that or I am
not understanding something and if I am feel free to explain. My
understanding is that when we assign a new qdisc via tc the
qdisc/transmit queues end up with a configuration kind of like what
Dave has on slide 7 at
(http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/davem_seattle08.pdf). Adding more
queues doesn't resolve anything since I am still going through the
same qdisc regardless of how many queues I have. The changes to the
dequeue portion of this qdisc are the most important part for this
change since I need them to keep the qdisc from jamming up in a
dequeue/requeue loop if the packet at the head of the qdisc needs to
go to a stopped hardware transmit queue.
> cheers,
> jamal
>
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists