[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080825170148.GA31059@susedev.qlogic.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:01:48 -0700
From: Ron Mercer <ron.mercer@...gic.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, Linux-Driver@...gic.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] New Qlogic 10Gb Ethernet driver for 2.6.28
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:43:43PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ron Mercer <ron.mercer@...gic.com>
> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:46:26 -0700
>
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:42:52AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > I also notice that this driver does not do:
> > >
> > > skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
> > >
> > > on RX packets to get the IP headers properly 4-byte aligned aligned
> > > after the ethernet header.
> >
> > The chip currenly has problems with 2-byte aligned receive buffers.
> > It will be fixed in the next turn.
>
> If the chip cannot handle this, you will need to copy into a properly
> aligned buffer.
>
> Otherwise some RISC platforms will take unaligned access traps, which
> run extremely slowly, when 32-bit and larger members of the protocol
> headers are read by the networking stack.
I see your point. I will add the re-alignment but would like to jump
over it for platforms that don't need it. Is there a list somewhere of
the RISC platforms that take a trap on unaligned accesses? Or better
yet, a list of those that don't?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists