[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080826093632.GW7908@solarflare.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:36:33 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeff@...zik.org,
Linux-Driver@...gic.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] New Qlogic 10Gb Ethernet driver for 2.6.28
Ron Mercer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:43:43PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Ron Mercer <ron.mercer@...gic.com>
> > Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:46:26 -0700
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:42:52AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > I also notice that this driver does not do:
> > > >
> > > > skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
> > > >
> > > > on RX packets to get the IP headers properly 4-byte aligned aligned
> > > > after the ethernet header.
> > >
> > > The chip currenly has problems with 2-byte aligned receive buffers.
> > > It will be fixed in the next turn.
> >
> > If the chip cannot handle this, you will need to copy into a properly
> > aligned buffer.
> >
> > Otherwise some RISC platforms will take unaligned access traps, which
> > run extremely slowly, when 32-bit and larger members of the protocol
> > headers are read by the networking stack.
>
> I see your point. I will add the re-alignment but would like to jump
> over it for platforms that don't need it. Is there a list somewhere of
> the RISC platforms that take a trap on unaligned accesses? Or better
> yet, a list of those that don't?
You can use #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists