[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1KYyCW-00025D-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:15:20 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: buytenh@...tstofly.org (Lennert Buytenhek)
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, dale@...nsworth.org,
nico@....org
Subject: Re: cpu utilisation improvement when not doing netif_tx_{stop,wake}_queue()
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org> wrote:
>
> I.e. transmitting wire speed gigabit over a single TCP session takes
> around 90% CPU time (measured with cyclesoak) if I have the TX queue
> flow control enabled, but only 70% if I rip the TX queue flow control
> out. (This is on a relatively underpowered ARM box.)
How many cores and how many queues?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists