[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809022148.m82LmKQu014384@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:48:20 -0700
From: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
To: jeff@...zik.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
chrisl@...are.com, arvidjaar@...l.ru, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
john.ronciak@...el.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com,
pratap@...are.com, zach@...are.com
Subject: [patch for 2.6.27? 4/4] e1000e: prevent corruption of EEPROM/NVM
From: Christopher Li <chrisl@...are.com>
Andrey reports e1000e corruption, and that a patch in vmware's ESX fixed
it.
The EEPROM corruption is triggered by concurrent access of the EEPROM
read/write. Putting a lock around it solve the problem.
[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK to avoid confusing lockdep]
Signed-off-by: Christopher Li <chrisl@...are.com>
Reported-by: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
Cc: Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc: Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@...are.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
Cc: PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Cc: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff -puN drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c~e1000e-prevent-corruption-of-eeprom-nvm drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c~e1000e-prevent-corruption-of-eeprom-nvm
+++ a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c
@@ -144,6 +144,8 @@ static s32 e1000_host_if_read_cookie(str
static u8 e1000_calculate_mng_checksum(char *buffer, u32 length);
static s32 e1000_configure_kmrn_for_10_100(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 duplex);
static s32 e1000_configure_kmrn_for_1000(struct e1000_hw *hw);
+static s32 e1000_do_read_eeprom(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words, u16 *data);
+static s32 e1000_do_write_eeprom(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words, u16 *data);
/* IGP cable length table */
static const
@@ -168,6 +170,8 @@ u16 e1000_igp_2_cable_length_table[IGP02
83, 89, 95, 100, 105, 109, 113, 116, 119, 122, 124,
104, 109, 114, 118, 121, 124};
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(e1000_eeprom_lock);
+
/******************************************************************************
* Set the phy type member in the hw struct.
*
@@ -4904,6 +4908,15 @@ static s32 e1000_spi_eeprom_ready(struct
*****************************************************************************/
s32 e1000_read_eeprom(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words, u16 *data)
{
+ s32 ret;
+ spin_lock(&e1000_eeprom_lock);
+ ret = e1000_do_read_eeprom(hw, offset, words, data);
+ spin_unlock(&e1000_eeprom_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static s32 e1000_do_read_eeprom(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words, u16 *data)
+{
struct e1000_eeprom_info *eeprom = &hw->eeprom;
u32 i = 0;
@@ -5236,6 +5249,16 @@ s32 e1000_update_eeprom_checksum(struct
*****************************************************************************/
s32 e1000_write_eeprom(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words, u16 *data)
{
+ s32 ret;
+ spin_lock(&e1000_eeprom_lock);
+ ret = e1000_do_write_eeprom(hw, offset, words, data);
+ spin_unlock(&e1000_eeprom_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+static s32 e1000_do_write_eeprom(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words, u16 *data)
+{
struct e1000_eeprom_info *eeprom = &hw->eeprom;
s32 status = 0;
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists