[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52060519E7@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 15:01:28 -0700
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <chrisl@...are.com>, <arvidjaar@...l.ru>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
<pratap@...are.com>, <zach@...are.com>
Subject: RE: [patch for 2.6.27? 4/4] e1000e: prevent corruption of EEPROM/NVM
akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> From: Christopher Li <chrisl@...are.com>
>
> Andrey reports e1000e corruption, and that a patch in vmware's ESX
> fixed
> it.
>
> The EEPROM corruption is triggered by concurrent access of the EEPROM
> read/write. Putting a lock around it solve the problem.
>
NAK. Please do not apply this patch, for reasons mentioned in my other
reply just sent to netdev.
The RTNL should be preventing this from being a possible bug in *Linux*
and if it is not we have much larger problems, not the least of which is
that this patch doesn't lock against the driver accessing the eeprom
simultaneously.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists