lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080905213606.0b4e246a.billfink@mindspring.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:36:06 -0400
From:	Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
To:	Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@....mpg.de>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Channel bonding with e1000

On Fri, 05 Sep 2008, Carsten Aulbert wrote:

> I have a brief problem and would ask for a little assistance:
> 
> On a few data servers we intend to do channel bonding. The boxes have
> two NICs on the motherboard and two extra ones on an expansion card:
> 
> 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB DPT LAN
> Controller Copper (rev 01)
> 04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB DPT LAN
> Controller Copper (rev 01)
> 05:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet
> Controller (rev 03)
> 05:02.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet
> Controller (rev 03)
> 
> My simple question would be: Does it matter which two ports I can use to
> channel together when using in a set-up with MTU=9000?

I don't know the specifics of your case, but sometimes the builtin
NICs on the motherboard may not have as much memory buffering as
the better addon NICs.

Also check the respective PCI buses of the onboard NICs versus the
addon NICs.  If one is PCI versus PCI-X or PCI-E, or are different
speeds or bus widths, this can obviously significantly impact
performance, especially when doing bonding.

Of course nothing beats some quick performance tests to determine
which is the better performing combination.

						-Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ