netdev - Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f4845fc0809101030u2bd4dec4jb478ecc65240ea74@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:30:52 +0200
From:	"Julius Volz" <juliusv@...gle.com>
To:	"Simon Horman" <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Vince Busam" <vbusam@...gle.com>, wensong@...ux-vs.org
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
>> Great, thanks! I have tested TCP+UDP, local+remote clients, v4+v6,
>> NAT+DSR+TUN in all combinations that are expected to be working and
>> found no problems.
>
> Thanks once again for your testing. I'll send a pull request to Dave in
> the morning.

Thanks very much!

(CC: Wensong)
I guess it would make sense to start hosting the new ipvsadm version
somewhere on http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ soon. It could still
be marked as unstable and saying, "If you intend to use the
experimental IPv6 support for IPVS introduced in kernel 2.6.XX, you
will need this new version of ipvsadm: ...". Also, we can then point
to it in the Kconfig help text in CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6. What do you
think?

Julius

-- 
Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps

Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html