lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:39:29 +0200 From: "Julius Volz" <juliusv@...gle.com> To: "Joseph Mack NA3T" <jmack@...d.net> Cc: lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, j.stubbs@...kthink.co.jp Subject: Re: Adding SNAT support to LVS/NAT On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@...d.net> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, Julius Volz wrote: > >> So maybe it would already work? ;) > > No. Some highly motivated people tried doing SNAT on OUTPUT in an attempt to > do F5-SNAT and it didn't work. This lead to the write up in > > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.non-modified_realservers.html#F5_snat > > which brings us to where we are now. Thanks for the info! Right, I even said myself in the previous reply that ip_vs_postrouting() stops further processing in the POSTROUTING chain, so it never reaches netfilter NAT code. I still think an in-IPVS SNAT would be nice anyways... don't know if I'll find the time to hack on it soon, though. Julius -- Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists