netdev - Re: clarify code intent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:53:40 -0700
From:	Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@...hia.inria.fr>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clarify code intent

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:36 -0700, David Miller wrote:

> This is just syntactic masterbation, sa_family_t is typedef'd
> "unsigned short".

Would you take a patch to remove sa_family_t from the kernel code and
headers ? Otherwise, I suspect that you can understand that it is a bit
hard for others to figure out where it is appropriate to use it and
where it is not.

regards,
Mathieu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html