| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <48D39B13.60401@myri.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:29:07 +0200 From: Brice Goglin <brice@...i.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: multiqueue interrupts... Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:38 -0700, David Miller wrote: > [...] > >> So on a multiqueue card with 2 RX queues and 2 TX queues we'd >> have names like: >> >> eth0-rx-0 >> eth0-rx-1 >> eth0-tx-0 >> eth0-tx-1 >> >> So let's make an effort to get this done right in 2.6.28 and meanwhile >> Arjan can add the irqbalanced code. >> > > What about the case where an interrupt is shared between RX and TX > completions? Our hardware is very flexible in this regard, but based on > performance testing prior to the introduction of TX multiqueue we > currently allocate multiple interrupts for RX completions and share the > first with TX completions. > myri10ge uses the same interrupts for TX and RX. The current name is eth%d:slice-%d but we could change it if there's a consensus. Brice -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists