[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1222064651.13064.6.camel@californication>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:24:11 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: btusb suspend/resume bug...
Hi Dave,
> > Marcel, others, please bring some kind of closure to this
> > regression list entry:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
> > Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git
> > Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (19 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4
> > Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4
> >
> > There is a patch, it is tested, so the only course of action at
> > this point is to merge the fix or declare that this really isn't
> > a regression.
> >
> > My impression is the later, because the driver btusb is replacing
> > doesn't handle suspend/resume either. Isn't that right?
>
> the original patch that I had was expecting changes in the USB subsystem
> that I deemed to much at this point. However Oliver got a patch that
> would make it work without the USB changes. I am still testing it.
>
> Let me see if I get some free minutes during the PlumbersConf to get
> this fully tested.
so I took the patch apart and actually found a few more issues. I am not
sure if they should be applied this late in -rc phase.
Rafael, can you pull from my tree and test the changes:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/holtmann/bluetooth-2.6.git
It would be interesting if these fixes are enough. Or if you need the
attached suspend/resume patch.
Regards
Marcel
View attachment "patch-btusb-suspend" of type "text/x-patch" (2027 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists