netdev - Re: net-next-2.6 [pull-request] [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Revised set of feature-negotiation patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080922062807.GA12068@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:28:07 +0200
From:	Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	acme@...hat.com, dccp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net-next-2.6 [pull-request] [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Revised set of
	feature-negotiation patches

| There are two paths forward at the current point in time.
| 
| 1) You submit a very small group of patches at a time to me.
|    I'm talking like 5 or 6 patches at a time, maximum.
| 
|    And I'm going to give extra amounts of personal review to
|    these, so it will take even more time than usual.
| 
Further review can never harm, so I am sure this will be good.

I have a question regarding granularity - the current granularity is
meant to be logical, but is low.
It is easy to get distracted by the details since at the end of
the day the 37 patches achieve a rewriting of feat.c in small steps.

Would you therefore be ok with me combining some of the patches or would
you prefer to review the set at its current granularity?

Thanks
Gerrit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html