[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080921.235853.223987556.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk
Cc: acme@...hat.com, dccp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net-next-2.6 [pull-request] [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Revised set of
feature-negotiation patches
From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:28:07 +0200
> | There are two paths forward at the current point in time.
> |
> | 1) You submit a very small group of patches at a time to me.
> | I'm talking like 5 or 6 patches at a time, maximum.
> |
> | And I'm going to give extra amounts of personal review to
> | these, so it will take even more time than usual.
> |
> Further review can never harm, so I am sure this will be good.
>
> I have a question regarding granularity - the current granularity is
> meant to be logical, but is low.
> It is easy to get distracted by the details since at the end of
> the day the 37 patches achieve a rewriting of feat.c in small steps.
>
> Would you therefore be ok with me combining some of the patches or would
> you prefer to review the set at its current granularity?
Current granularity.
So, submit about 5 pieces at a time, you can say at the beginning of
the series (in the [PATCH 0/X]: email) something like "this is phase N
in the rewriting of feat.c which will achieve X Y and Z"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists