[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080926054600.GA4141@ff.dom.local>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:46:00 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Use RCU for the UDP hash lock
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:18:33PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
...
> This patch is the second try; I believe I fixed all issues that people
> raised.
Actually, you've skipped my first question, so I still don't know, why
you don't use an _init version of sk_del_node (even if it's safe in the
current implementation), while the non-rcu code uses only this?
...
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 06c5259..65110a6 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
...
> static inline int sk_unhashed(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> return hlist_unhashed(&sk->sk_node);
> @@ -361,6 +374,27 @@ static __inline__ int sk_del_node_init(struct sock *sk)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static inline int __sk_del_node_rcu(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + if (sk_hashed(sk)) {
> + hlist_del_rcu(&sk->sk_node);
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sk_del_node_rcu(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + int rc = __sk_del_node_rcu(sk);
> +
> + if (rc) {
> + /* paranoid for a while -acme */
> + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sk->sk_refcnt) == 1);
> + __sock_put(sk);
> + }
> + return rc;
> +}
...
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists