[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <48DCE59D.6060003@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:37:33 -0500
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Use RCU for the UDP hash lock
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:18:33PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> ...
>
>> This patch is the second try; I believe I fixed all issues that people
>> raised.
>>
>
> Actually, you've skipped my first question, so I still don't know, why
> you don't use an _init version of sk_del_node (even if it's safe in the
> current implementation), while the non-rcu code uses only this?
>
I guess it didn't matter, but it doesn't matter and consistency is
important, so I've changed it.
-corey
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
>> index 06c5259..65110a6 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
>>
> ...
>
>> static inline int sk_unhashed(const struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> return hlist_unhashed(&sk->sk_node);
>> @@ -361,6 +374,27 @@ static __inline__ int sk_del_node_init(struct sock *sk)
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int __sk_del_node_rcu(struct sock *sk)
>> +{
>> + if (sk_hashed(sk)) {
>> + hlist_del_rcu(&sk->sk_node);
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int sk_del_node_rcu(struct sock *sk)
>> +{
>> + int rc = __sk_del_node_rcu(sk);
>> +
>> + if (rc) {
>> + /* paranoid for a while -acme */
>> + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sk->sk_refcnt) == 1);
>> + __sock_put(sk);
>> + }
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>>
> ...
>
> Jarek P.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists