netdev - Re: Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "0/0".

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:15:18 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Krzysztof Oledzki <ole@....pl>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "0/0".



On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:01:27 +0800
> Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
>> Krzysztof Oledzki <ole@....pl> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2ca4abdcb823e708b88156f947fa5b493055618a
>>>
>>> ;)
>>
>> Hmm, this breaks several scripts of mine that use 10/8.  Couldn't
>> we just fall back to the old loop when inet_aton fails?
>>
>> Thanks,
>
>
> There is no easy solution, I'll will have to go back rewrite this
> code, and will document the result. I expect the result will displease
> someone, but given the original code that is just going to happen.
>
> Busted cases:
>                           correct           incorrect
> Original code: 127.2   =>  127.0.0.2         127.2.0.0
> inet_pton:     10.0    =>  10.0.0.0          fails invalid
> inet_aton:     10      =>  10.0.0.0          0.0.0.10
>
> The problem was Alexey (or Jamal) invented their own abbreviation format
> and did not follow unix standard conventions.

It seems that the original code followed the unix standard:

# telnet 127.2
Trying 127.0.0.2...
telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.2: Connection refused

Best regards,

 				Krzysztof Olędzki