[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081104.215839.132524253.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:58:39 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mchan@...adcom.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...eteddy.net, daniel.blueman@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: time for TCP ECN defaulting to on?
From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:16:03 -0800
> I think this is no longer a limitation. The GSO code will take care
> of ECN properly if the hardware does not support it when doing TSO.
Hmm, good point, but if that is what happens I don't know if I agree
with it.
If "take care of ECN" means doing TSO in software, that's in my
opinion the wrong thing to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists