[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081110172836.0aaec702@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:28:36 -0500
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [proposed patch] via-rhine: prevent oops when requesting an IRQ
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:07:41 -0500
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > via-rhine: prevent oops when requesting an IRQ
> >
> > via-rhine requests an IRQ before it's ready to handle an interrupt.
> > It oopses when CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ is enabled.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469303
> >
> > ---
> >
> > NOTE: UNTESTED: Is it okay to init the hardware before requesting the
> > IRQ, or should that be done afterward?
>
> First of all, _ideally_ your interrupt handler should be able to any
> state of software initialization, once registers are mapped. So I would
> first concentrate on "hardening" the interrupt handler, if feasible.
>
> It is certainly a common technique to disable interrupts somehow, during
> initialization of the hardware. Note, though, that doing things before
> request_irq() is no real guarantee you are out of danger -- you might be
> on a shared PCI irq, and your init causes that interrupt to "scream"
> even though your driver has not registered the irq.
>
The problem with this driver is that it doesn't call alloc_ring() before
request_irq() and then it oopses in the interrupt handler trying to access
the ring.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists