[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4918B722.8020703@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:35:14 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [proposed patch] via-rhine: prevent oops when requesting an IRQ
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:07:41 -0500
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>
>> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>>> via-rhine: prevent oops when requesting an IRQ
>>>
>>> via-rhine requests an IRQ before it's ready to handle an interrupt.
>>> It oopses when CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ is enabled.
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469303
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> NOTE: UNTESTED: Is it okay to init the hardware before requesting the
>>> IRQ, or should that be done afterward?
>> First of all, _ideally_ your interrupt handler should be able to any
>> state of software initialization, once registers are mapped. So I would
>> first concentrate on "hardening" the interrupt handler, if feasible.
>>
>> It is certainly a common technique to disable interrupts somehow, during
>> initialization of the hardware. Note, though, that doing things before
>> request_irq() is no real guarantee you are out of danger -- you might be
>> on a shared PCI irq, and your init causes that interrupt to "scream"
>> even though your driver has not registered the irq.
>>
>
> The problem with this driver is that it doesn't call alloc_ring() before
> request_irq() and then it oopses in the interrupt handler trying to access
> the ring.
Allocation should definitely occur prior to request_irq()
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists