[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491D8C1A.5060003@openvz.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:32:58 +0300
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] scm: fix scm_fp_list->list initialization made in wrong place
This is the next page of the scm recursion story (the commit
f8d570a4 net: Fix recursive descent in __scm_destroy()).
In function scm_fp_dup(), the INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fpl->list) of newly
created fpl is done *before* the subsequent memcpy from the old
structure and thus the freshly initialized list is overwritten.
But that's OK, since this initialization is not required at all,
since the fpl->list is list_add-ed at the destruction time in any
case (and is unused in other code), so I propose to drop both
initializations, rather than moving it after the memcpy.
Please, correct me if I miss something significant.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
---
diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
index ab242cc..b12303d 100644
--- a/net/core/scm.c
+++ b/net/core/scm.c
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static int scm_fp_copy(struct cmsghdr *cmsg, struct scm_fp_list **fplp)
if (!fpl)
return -ENOMEM;
*fplp = fpl;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fpl->list);
fpl->count = 0;
}
fpp = &fpl->fp[fpl->count];
@@ -301,7 +300,6 @@ struct scm_fp_list *scm_fp_dup(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
new_fpl = kmalloc(sizeof(*fpl), GFP_KERNEL);
if (new_fpl) {
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_fpl->list);
for (i=fpl->count-1; i>=0; i--)
get_file(fpl->fp[i]);
memcpy(new_fpl, fpl, sizeof(*fpl));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists