[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081113.184225.113857300.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:42:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Cc: linux@....linux.org.uk, grfstrm@...rs.sourceforge.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Validation of DMA params breaks e100 driver (2.6.28-rc2)
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:21:50 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 05:27:59PM +0100, Anders Grafström wrote:
> > > The e100 driver triggers BUG_ON(buf->direction != dir)
> > > by doing pci_map_single(..., PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)
> > > and pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(..., PCI_DMA_TODEVICE).
> > >
> > > I'm guessing it's allowed to do that and that something like
> > > the patch below is called for?
> >
> > No, it is not allowed to do that - that's why it's called "BUG_ON".
> > Changing the DMA direction, especially with dmabounce will result
> > in unexpected behaviour.
>
> okay, how about this patch... only compile tested as I couldn't get
> net-next-2.6 to boot on my test machine. I'll get some testing done on
> this, but in the meantime....
>
> e100: fix dma error in direction for mapping
>
> From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
FWIW this looks good to me.
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists