[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491DE18D.2070302@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:37:33 +0100
From: Anders Grafström <grfstrm@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Validation of DMA params breaks e100 driver (2.6.28-rc2)
Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 05:27:59PM +0100, Anders Grafström wrote:
>>> The e100 driver triggers BUG_ON(buf->direction != dir)
>>> by doing pci_map_single(..., PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)
>>> and pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(..., PCI_DMA_TODEVICE).
>>>
>>> I'm guessing it's allowed to do that and that something like
>>> the patch below is called for?
>> No, it is not allowed to do that - that's why it's called "BUG_ON".
>> Changing the DMA direction, especially with dmabounce will result
>> in unexpected behaviour.
>
> okay, how about this patch... only compile tested as I couldn't get
> net-next-2.6 to boot on my test machine. I'll get some testing done on
> this, but in the meantime....
>
> e100: fix dma error in direction for mapping
>
> From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
I failed to save this patch (flowed format?) but I applied it manually
to 2.6.28-rc4 and tried it. Appears to work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists