lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081117153155.GA3446@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:31:55 +0100
From:	Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	dccp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Deprecate old setsockopt framework

| > This patch removes the old setsockopt interface and replaces it with two new
| > functions to register NN/SP values for feature negotiation. 
<snip>
| But you have to understand that this is something you should think
| about never doing again.  User interfaces are never "oops sorry, we
| misdesigned that, we'll just take it away and emit some warning,
| fix your app"  Once it's out there, you gotta support it forever.
| 

I hope that the present solution of replacing is sufficient since there was
at least one crash reported with the old interface, on
http://www.spinics.net/lists/dccp/msg03371.html

Later within the patch set (not in the current submission) there is also a 
setsockopt warning that the old interface is no longer valid (in the patch
"dccp: Deprecate old setsockopt framework" on http://eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk).

With regard to interface changes, it would be best/easier to keep them within
one release. I am not up-to-date how long net-next-2.6 will remain open,
but if you are pushing it out soon, it would be best not to push out the old
and the new interface in parallel.

I am otherwise happy to resubmit the reviewed patches again later, as
already done after the last merge window.

With regard to compilation there are no concerns, patches are all tested to
compile standalone.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.

Gerrit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ