[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4925241E.7090505@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:47:26 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] question about inet_listen_lock(), and [PATCH] net: listening_hash
get a spinlock per bucket
David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:21:19 +0100
>
>> [PATCH] net: listening_hash get a spinlock per bucket
>>
>> This patch prepares RCU migration of listening_hash table for
>> TCP/DCCP protocols.
>>
>> listening_hash table being small (32 slots per protocol), we add
>> a spinlock for each slot, instead of a single rwlock for whole table.
>>
>> This should reduce hold time of readers, and writers concurrency.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>
> Ok it looks indeed as this sleeping thing was just a queer way to wait
> when there was some thread dumping listening sockets. I guess it must
> have been _really_ slow back when that was written by Alexey :)
>
> I've applied your patch to net-next-2.6, thanks Eric!
>
>
Thanks a lot David for your analysis, I will continue the work further.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists