netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/6] smsc911x: add dynamic bus configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OF7747D767.14F5C717-ON8025750A.004A27CB-8025750A.004B0FA5@smsc.com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:39:05 +0000
From:	Steve.Glendinning@...c.com
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	ian.saturley@...c.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] smsc911x: add dynamic bus configuration

Hi Dave,

Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote on 06/11/2008 13:10:10:
> > Convert the driver to select 16-bit or 32-bit bus access at runtime,
> > at a small performance cost.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...c.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> 
> I tested it on the RealView platforms and works OK (can't tell about the
> other platforms).

Could you please apply the second patch in this set  to net-next (Jeff 
applied the first, the others are listed as "awaiting upstream" in 
patchwork), as all the later platform-dependant patches in the set require 
it.

Should I push the sh arch-dependant patches (3-5) via the sh tree, or does 
it make more sense to include them here as they depend on patches 1-2?

Regards,
--
Steve Glendinning
SMSC GmbH
m: +44 777 933 9124
e: steve.glendinning@...c.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html