netdev - Re: Question about HFSC atm+man patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4929632F.3050200@trash.net>
Date:	Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:05:35 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Michal Soltys <soltys@....info>
CC:	linux-net@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about HFSC atm+man patches

Michal Soltys wrote:
> I'm thinking about writing few simple patches that would introduce layer
> 2 adaptation to HFSC. Generally - instead of preparing adjusted rate
> table like some of the other qdiscs do (tbf, htb, ...), hfsc could
> simply adjust packets' lengths in qdisc code (and there are just few 
> places where it's done) - as it's used for all time / curve related 
> computations later. So the whole thing should be, at least in theory, 
> pretty straightforward.
> 
> The tc's interface would of course remain the same - that is - linklayer
> and overhead options, consistently with other qdiscs.
> 
> Would such approach be valid and possibly accepted ?

We already support generic size adjustment for all qdiscs. I'm
not sure about the userspace interface though.

> Another thing I'd like to add is detailed tc-hfsc man page (and maybe
> add/update other ones - but that's for a bit later).

That would be great.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html