[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081123.135311.74121589.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:53:11 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jeff@...zik.org
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, romieu@...zoreil.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8139too: use err.h macros
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:36:45 -0500
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:22:37AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Instead of using call by reference use the PTR_ERR macros to handle
> > return value with error case. Compile tested only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> >
> > --- a/drivers/net/8139too.c 2008-11-23 10:16:26.000000000 -0800
> > +++ b/drivers/net/8139too.c 2008-11-23 10:19:05.000000000 -0800
> > @@ -741,8 +741,7 @@ static void rtl8139_chip_reset (void __i
> > }
> >
> >
> > -static int __devinit rtl8139_init_board (struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > - struct net_device **dev_out)
> > +static __devinit struct net_device * rtl8139_init_board (struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > {
> > void __iomem *ioaddr;
> > struct net_device *dev;
>
> I won't NAK this, but I do wonder why a solution based on yucky
> magic typecasting is preferred...?
Two return values without having to return it by reference
as an argument.
I blogged about the pros and cons of this earlier this year.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists