[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081124165019.624ee996@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:50:19 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Denis Joseph Barrow <D.Barow@...ion.com>,
Linux USB kernel mailing list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux netdev Mailing list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: respin of hso patches for linux-2.6.28-rc6 hso_close_fix.patch
[patch 2/6 ]
> > D1("Closing serial port");
> > + if (serial == NULL || serial->magic != HSO_SERIAL_MAGIC) {
> > + D1("invalid serial structure bailing out.\n");
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> using !serial instead of serial == NULL would be better.
A lot of serial code uses == NULL and its just as clear IMHO.
A bigger concern would be the lack of refcounting. Really for 2.6.28 now
the refcount patches are in the direction should be refcounting the tty
objects at least.
I've got a pair of proposed patches I'll post for comment
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists