netdev - Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] linux-next: 20081125 - 8390 network driver build fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081125193853.076c7b58@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:38:53 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	p_gortmaker@...oo.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] linux-next: 20081125 - 8390 network driver
 build fails

> The problem is that both 8390.c and 8390p.c #include lib8390.c
> and when they are both linked to built-in drivers (not loadable
> modules), the symbols in lib8390.c are duplicated.  I think.

And the symbols in question are static so are scoped within the file
only. Thats why it looks to me as if someone has done "#define static" in
another patch somewhere in -next.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html