netdev - Re: respin of hso patches for linux-2.6.28-rc6 hso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081125.031150.170595881.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:11:50 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc:	D.Barow@...ion.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: respin of hso patches for linux-2.6.28-rc6 hso_mutex.patch
 [patch 4/6]

From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:42:13 +0000

> That patch series is a complete mix:
> 
> 1, 3 and 6 are network
> 2 is a broken tty layer patch
> 4 is a broken tty layer patch
> 5 is an ok tty layer patch
> 
> 5 will go into the tty tree
> 
> 2 and 4 clash with the tty tree already and don't deal with the tty side
> locking at all sanely.
> 
> So I've no problem with the network parts (1,3,6) going into the netdev
> tree but the other bits will make a mess if they do so.

Actually Alan, can you do me a favor?

These patches were not numbered, and when you say patch N it's ambiguous
(especially since they arrived on the mailing list in a different
order than they arrived in my private inbox, the latter of which is
the order I applied them to my tree).

So please let me know which patches exactly are which and I'll do the
reverting.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html