netdev - RE: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:42:12 -0800
From:	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To:	Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6

Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have something that looks like a regression in bonding between
>>> 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 (I'll try the mid-steps later).
> 
> There was something about that rc-27 could ruin my Intel NICs.. right?
> (I'll refrain from testing with those then).

you can test 2.6.27-rcX without worry for e1000e device corruption IF
you set CONFIG_FTRACE=n

ftrace was the code that ran over the registers mapped by e1000e.

just FYI, I know this thread is ancient.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html